When the financial horizon of Mexico began to take on the hues of digital innovation, it became evident that a transformation was underway.
This guide, prepared by experts who participated in the drafting of the Fintech Law (the regulatory framework for Financial Technology Institutions in Mexico), explains everything you need to know.
Original publication: March 9, 2018
Last reform: January 24, 2024
Last update of this guide: February 2026
Legal Paradox® is the only Chambers-ranked law firm in Mexico exclusively dedicated to fintech law.
The firm actively participated in the 270+ meetings with Mexico's financial regulators that produced the Ley Fintech (2018), co-authored the official book on the law, and helped draft all secondary regulation through the British Embassy Prosperity Fund.
Legal Paradox® has advised on 520+ fintech projects, including 8 unicorns, 9 banks, and 3 BigTech companies. The firm delivers IFPE authorizations in an average of 416 days versus the 781-day market average, and IFC authorizations in 418 days versus 878 days — based on published DOF data.
Legal Paradox® actively participated in the more than 270 meetings with the financial regulator that gave rise to the FinTech Law (the regulatory framework for Financial Technology Institutions in Mexico).
✅ +520 FinTech projects advised
✅ 8 Unicorns (startups valued at over $1 billion)
✅ 9 Banks
✅ 3 BigTech (large, dominant technology companies)
✅ Co-authors of the official book on the FinTech Law.
✅ The only boutique firm specialized in FinTech in Mexico, since 2017.

Live Data:
It all began when players such as Prestadero, Bitso, the Fintech Association of Mexico, and Afico recognized that the activities they were performing were in a gray area. It was possible to argue that these were regulated financial activities reserved solely for authorized entities.
The consequences could be devastating: millions in fines and even up to 15 years in prison. For entrepreneurs recognized internationally as great innovators, this represented a real risk.
During 2017, approximately 35% of Mexican FinTechs were being investigated for potential illegal deposit-taking (the unauthorized collection of funds from the public).
Our first client at Legal Paradox® was one of those entrepreneurs whom we, fortunately, brought out safe and sound without a single fine, let alone prison time.
As a collective, we approached the financial regulator and requested to be regulated. Fortunately, we met with receptive authorities who held more than 270 meetings so we could explain:
(i) What we were doing;
(ii) What the risks were and how they were being mitigated; and
(iii) Why our activity was different and desirable for financial inclusion (the process of ensuring access to financial services for all segments of society).
Our goal was clear: to leave the gray area and move into the major leagues.
On March 9, 2018, the FinTech Law was published after being signed during the inaugural session of the 81st Banking Convention. With this, Mexico became the first country in the world with a specific regulatory framework to promote innovation in financial services.
The Law to Regulate Financial Technology Institutions (known as the "FinTech Law") is the regulatory framework that governs financial technology companies in Mexico.
With this legislation, Mexico not only moved ahead of its contemporaries but also set a standard for the region, enabling FinTechs to experiment and grow under the watchful eye of regulators.
Main Objective
The purpose of the Law is to regulate the financial services provided by ITFs (Financial Technology Institutions), as well as their organization, operation, and functioning, in addition to financial services subject to special regulations offered or carried out through innovative means.
The Mexican FinTech Law applies to:
Instituciones de Financiamiento Colectivo (IFC) — Crowdfunding (platforms that connect investors with applicants for debt or equity financing)
Instituciones de Fondos de Pago Electrónico (IFPE) — Digital Wallets
Companies authorized to operate Innovative Models (Sandbox) — (a controlled environment for testing innovative financial services with temporary licenses)
Financial entities operating with virtual assets — (cryptocurrencies and digital assets regulated under the central bank's framework)
Third parties providing services to ITFs — (Financial Technology Institutions)
All Mexican Financial Entities for the purposes of Open Finance — (the mandatory sharing of data between institutions through secure technology)
The purpose of the Law is to regulate the financial services provided by ITFs (Financial Technology Institutions), as well as their organization, operation, and functioning, in addition to financial services subject to special regulations offered or carried out through innovative means.
These are crowdfunding platforms that connect members of the general public so they can provide financing to one another.
- Debt: Investors grant loans or credit (e.g., P2P Lending, peer-to-peer lending).
- Equity: Investors acquire shares in the capital stock of legal entities.
- Joint Venture and Royalties: Investors acquire a stake in assets or future income.
From 500,000 UDIs to 700,000 UDIs (Investment Units, a regulated unit of account indexed to inflation) (approx. $4.4 to $6.1 Million MXN)
Market average: ~878 days
Legal Paradox® Clients: ~418 days
Advantage: 52% faster
These are entities authorized to issue, manage, and redeem electronic payment funds (wallets or electronic money accounts).
- Issuance, administration, redemption, and transmission of electronic payment funds.
- Payment processing and money transmission services.
- Payment network services (Issuers, aggregators, acquirers, specialized companies)
From 500,000 UDIs to 700,000 UDIs (Investment Units, a regulated unit of account indexed to inflation) (approx. $4.4 to $6.1 Million MXN)
Market average: ~781 days
Legal Paradox® Clients: ~416 days
Advantage: 47% faster
The application must include (Article 39 of the LRITF, the Law to Regulate Financial Technology Institutions), among others:
Powers of attorney for the promoters' representatives
Draft bylaws or their amendment (estatutos sociales, the constitutional documents that govern a company's internal structure and rules).
Business plan with financial projections
Client account segregation policies
Risk disclosure and liability policies
Information security and confidentiality measures
KYC (know-your-customer, client identification processes)
Conflict of interest policies
Fraud prevention policies
Agreements with technology providers
Business continuity policies (contingency plans designed to ensure that essential business functions can continue to operate during and after a disaster or disruption)
Model agreement (standardized contract) for clients
Shareholder and administrator information (the detailed identification and background documentation for those who own or manage the entity)
Domicile within national territory
Financial feasibility study
Over 50 highly technical documents
Compliance Officer certified by the CNBV (National Banking and Securities Commission, the federal regulator of the Mexican financial system)
In the event of having a Board of Directors, at least 20% must be independent members.
A law firm of recognized prestige in the shareholders' country of origin (such as Legal Paradox®, which is recognized by the financial regulator as the
FinTech Lawyers).
CISO (Chief Information Security Officer) (the CEO may fulfill this role for up to 12 months, starting from the date the authorization is obtained).
Auditor to validate financial information and technological infrastructure (pentest, penetration testing to evaluate system security).
Development team (Highly desirable).
Foreign currency transfers: Specific authorizations for managing accounts or transactions in currencies other than the Mexican Peso
Receiving or delivering cash: Approval for physical cash handling, typically requiring specific security protocols
Sending and receiving international transfers: Permits for cross-border transactions and compliance with international banking standards
Foreign exchange operations: Authorizations to perform currency exchange services (buying and selling foreign currency)
Use of Biometrics: Approval for the use of physiological or behavioral data (such as fingerprints or facial recognition) for client identification and authentication
Contracting third parties with access to sensitive information: Regulatory vetting for outsourcing core technological or operational services that involve user data
Contracting commission agents: Authorization to use third-party intermediaries (comisionistas, entities that act on behalf of the institution to provide services) to expand physical reach
Direct connection to SPEI (Interbank Electronic Payment System): The high-level authorization from Banxico (The Central Bank of Mexico) to connect directly to the national real-time settlement system
National Banking and Securities Commission (CNBV)
Role: Supervisory authority of ITFs (Financial Technology Institutions).
Issues general provisions (secondary regulations).
Imposes sanctions and revokes authorizations.
At Legal Paradox®, we supported them in drafting the secondary FinTech regulation through the British-Mexican Embassy, in addition to training them on FinTech and Blockchain topics on several occasions
Bank of Mexico (Banxico)
Role: Regulates operations with virtual assets (cryptocurrencies) and payment systems.
Authorizes operations with Virtual Assets.
Regulates connection to payment systems such as SPEI (Interbank Electronic Payment System).
At Legal Paradox®, we supported them with Blockchain and AI training in collaboration with Afico (the Mexican Crowdfunding Association), in addition to presenting various analyses on Virtual Assets. We also represent the Mexican consortium created to support Project Agora (a BIS-led initiative for the tokenization of bank deposits) formed by Solana, Stellar, Bitso, and Etherfuse, among others.
Ministry of Finance and Public Credit (SHCP)
Role: Financial policy oversight.
Presides over the Inter-institutional Committee and is in charge of the Financial Innovation Group.
The SHCP has invited Legal Paradox® on several occasions to present advancements in the FinTech, Blockchain, Agrotech, and AI sectors to the Financial Innovation Group.
National Commission for the Protection and Defense of Financial Services Users (Condusef)
Role: Protection of financial services users.
Handles user claims and complaints.
Supervises adhesion contracts (standardized service agreements).
At Legal Paradox®, we supported them in creating the provisions for handling complaints through electronic means.

Mexico has one of the highest banking concentration indices in Latin America: just 5 institutions control the financial destiny of millions.
FinTechs arrived to democratize access, providing services to those who were marginalized from the traditional banking system.
FinTechs in Mexico are growing at 50% vs. 20% globally. Since the publication of the Law, the sector has grown by more than 596%, positioning Mexico as the second-largest FinTech market in Latin America.















Once again, thank you very much for your excellent work.
We had a great reception at the Solana Summit in Mexico, thanks to Legal Paradox® for all their support.
It is the first time a law firm has asked me about my experience with them; they have earned extra points.
Traditional financial entities have moved from observing FinTechs to actively forming strategic alliances.
What do sector leaders say?
Felipe Vallejo, President of the FinTech Mexico Association
"Even though the operating environment is different, collaboration has broad potential. We both face the same challenges and are trying to solve the same problems."
Angélica Arana, CIO at Banco Multiva
"FinTechs have disrupted the financial sector, challenging the status quo. Competition is healthy, and the synergies between FinTechs and banks have yielded very good results."
Get expert advice from Legal Paradox® to navigate the Mexican regulatory ecosystem.
Below are the most relevant articles of the Law to Regulate Financial Technology Institutions. For the full text, consult the Legal Library at the bottom of this page.
Access the full documents directly from official sources.