If your client's legal team does not know how to contract you, they will not. We build the compliance documentation that lets them say yes, and we work directly with their legal area until the contract is signed.
Book a 45-minute call →We work for the vendor. Direct partner access.
If your client's lawyer does not know how to contract you, the deal dies in the inbox. Nobody rejects you. The thread simply stops.
You cannot sell the software because the client lacks the CNBV file, and the file cannot be built because nothing has been sold yet. We have broken that loop before.
Banks and regulated entities will tell you regulation forbids the cloud. It does not, and we have shared a stage with Google saying so. We give your team the arguments to close that objection in the meeting.
The authorization your client files takes months. A vendor whose documentation is not ready when the yes arrives does not lose a week. It loses a quarter of pipeline.
We prepare a white-label legal opinion and a compliance guide your sales team attaches to the proposal. It tells your client's lawyer exactly how to contract you within the rules, so the review starts from a yes instead of a question.
Blocked by a licence requirement?
We restructure the alliance so the financial entity acts as a lead generator rather than contracting a regulated service. No notice, no authorization, immediate go to market.
When the CNBV raises observations on your client's file, we draft the response within 24 hours. The review cycle belongs to the regulator; the waiting between cycles does not have to belong to you.
Global leaders in Blockchain. A benchmark in Mexico, Latin America, and the Caribbean in the use of Blockchain and FinTech technology. We need more people like Legal Paradox®.
The best way to describe Legal Paradox® is as a full stack advisor. They have been a great ally in dispelling myths related to the adoption of technologies such as Cloud, AI, and Blockchain.
Insufficient disaggregation is the most common source of CNBV observations in vendor filings. Service descriptions are almost always written at the product or system level, which is right for a commercial contract and not for a regulator.
CNBV asks for a narrative at the process and sub-process level: what happens, in what sequence, on which systems, involving which data, executed by which personnel, and recoverable under which continuity provision. We extract that from your technical teams and do the translation ourselves, rather than asking engineers to write in regulatory language.
Vendors who have cleared authorizations elsewhere consistently underestimate the gap. Documentation that satisfies a European, Singaporean or US framework usually needs substantive reworking rather than formatting adjustments, because Mexico's documentation standard is among the most demanding.
Inconsistencies between the legal filing and the technical annexes are the other frequent source of observations. We prepare both, so the contradiction is caught before the regulator finds it rather than after.
Three stages. The first one often ends the matter, because plenty of services turn out not to require a filing at all.
Once the deal is closed, your client needs CNBV and Banxico authorization to contract you. We handle the complete filing, including the technical report, the mandatory contractual clauses and an adversarial pre-filing review, so the regulatory process never becomes the reason a signed contract stalls.
See all the requirements →
Forty-five minutes with Carlos Valderrama, the partner who will handle your matter. We work for the vendor, alongside your buyer's legal team. No billing surprises.
.png){kind=small}
