Queue times are set by the financial regulator, and the decision is always theirs. What is not fixed is how fast your file is built and how fast observations are answered.
According to the authorizations published in the Diario Oficial de la Federación, average authorization time across all CNBV authorizations in the index has moved from 594 days across 22 authorizations in one period to 853 across 73 in the next. The queue is the regulator's to manage. What you do get to choose is who builds the file, how few observations it triggers, and how fast they are answered. That is where the months are won.
On priority engagements we answer urgent items within 24 hours. We scale with systems, not junior headcount, so the partner stays on your critical path instead of becoming your bottleneck.
An international network since 2017, and the data to go with it: we are building the fintech map country by country. Colombia is live, Peru is next. We architect cross-border vehicles for tax neutrality and multi-jurisdictional exits.
We understand "Fintech-as-a-Service". We structure commercial commission models to navigate FaaS prohibitions legally, keeping your product roadmap alive.
Measured from the first application filing to publication in the Diario Oficial de la Federación, across every IFPE and IFC authorization on record.
Averages of all 61 IFPE and 27 IFC authorizations published in the DOF, including the two prepared by Legal Paradox®. Our timelines are single, dated results, not averages. Methodology →








Forty-five minutes with Carlos Valderrama, the partner who will handle your matter from this call onward. Not an associate, not a handoff after signing. No billing surprises.
Not ready to talk yet? Every figure on this page comes from the authorizations published in the Diario Oficial, and you can read the record yourself. No form required.
It is real, and it is tied to a documented historical record (Sylon case).
We do not control the regulator's internal queues, but we control what drives most delays: prevention cycles triggered by avoidable filing issues.
Our AI pre-validation, built on Mexico's published record, materially reduces those cycles, often removing up to 12 months from the timeline by submitting a cleaner, regulator-ready application.
We scale with systems, not junior headcount.
Our proprietary AI (Jurídicon®) handles the first-pass workstream and compresses cycle time, so partners stay focused on the critical path.
For priority engagements, we commit to a 24-hour response SLA on urgent items, so we do not become your bottleneck.
SLA terms apply to critical accounts under engagement scope.
No. We are enablers, not blockers.
If a model is prohibited, we do not stop at no. We re-architect the structure to reach the same commercial outcome inside the regulatory perimeter.
We focus on the how, not the if.
That approach has unlocked first-mover outcomes for clients, including the first regulated tokenization in Mexico (Etherfuse) and stablecoin-based remittances (Spin by Oxxo and Kira).
Almost never, and waiting usually costs more than moving. The handover itself is one link: you upload what you already have, the system reads it, maps the gaps, and builds your file. Nobody on your side fills a questionnaire. We have seen a file reach its third round of substantive observations before anyone questioned the approach, with a rejection and a full restart on the table. We have also seen a company spend seven years and two firms pursuing an authorization it did not need for the model it actually wanted to operate. In both cases the expensive part was not the work. It was answering the wrong question for years. We read what has been filed before we propose anything, and we will tell you if the right move is to stay where you are.